Latest update April 28th, 2024 12:47 AM
Sep 13, 2009 Features / Columnists, Ravi Dev
The philosopher Immanuel Kant succinctly posed the dilemma of organising a just state, two centuries ago, in these terms:
“The problem of organizing a state, however hard it may seem, can be solved, even for a race of devils, if only they are intelligent. The problem is, given a multitude of rational beings requiring universal laws for their preservation, but each of them is sincerely inclined to exempt himself from them, to establish a Constitution in such a way, although their private intentions conflict, they check each other, with the result that their public conduct is the same as if they had no such intentions.”
JUSTICE
Kant’s concrete solution to the inevitable conflicts he identified in organised human societies was that institutions, as with all normative behaviour, would have to satisfy the “categorical imperative” to be moral and just. In one popular formulation, this categorical imperative states: act in accordance to rules that you would wish applied to everyone as if they were universal laws.
Most commentators who followed him agreed with his stricture that institutions constituting a state must be organised in accordance with the principle of justice, but his criterion of the categorical imperative, proved nettlesome in real life. John Rawls, the most influential of modern liberal political philosophers, came up with another formulation to guide the formation of social institutions nearly two centuries later, in 1971. It had the great virtue of simplicity.
In the opening line of his first section in his magnum opus A Theory of Justice, Rawls boldly declared that the principle of “justice” is the standard that would generate the broad acceptability for the establishment of any institution necessary to implement any initiative for enduring stability: “Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought.”
Recognizing that Guyana does not even reach Rawls’ definition of a society as “a cooperative venture for mutual advantage, it is typically marked by a conflict as well as by an identity of interests.” his definition of “justice” is yet very pertinent to our effort to construct a democratic state in Guyana: “…a way of assigning rights and duties in the basic institutions of society and they define the appropriate distribution of the benefits and burdens of social cooperation.”
STATE POLICIES
In Guyana we all have to appreciate that the existence of the state itself is for the furtherance of the societal good – the public interest. Ultimately we believe that all Guyanese are looking to be culturally authentic, politically secure and economically sound. In the furtherance of these “public goods”, the people have to promulgate a constitution through which the government directs the state through policies and programs in consonance with the prime directives of the Constitution.
In modern democracies, under the liberal paradigm, equality of treatment and equality before the law of the citizens stands at the very top of the imperatives. We have proposed that under a federalist state institutions will be created to implement the policies of Ethnic Impact Statements, multiculturalism, federal form of government, Government of National Reconciliation, Catalytic Economic State, Affirmative Action etc. in the fulfilment of the national goals.
However, because each individual citizen or group of citizens are situated differently (according to specific criteria) governmental policies and programs will inevitably have a different impact on different citizens. Our tax laws, for instance, are designed to extract a greater percentage of the income of the rich than the poor. In fact we have decided that citizens earning below a certain threshold do not have to pay any taxes. While the rich may think that the law is discriminatory – they are not being treated equally – and it is, we accept it because we feel it is morally justified in furtherance of the societal good.
And this is the ultimate test that is used in both ethical and legal theories to evaluate state activity affecting citizens in society – especially when it is claimed that a particular action affects some citizens differently. The task of the Government is to ensure that their differential treatment is not arbitrary and capricious and irrational – and that they further some societal good. There should be a correlation between the classification and the purpose of the statute so that citizens can presume the impartiality of the legislators. Thus even those adversely impacted may consider it an acceptable cost of achieving a larger societal goal.
APPROPRIATE RULES
In Guyana, a feeling of injustice is palpable in all groups in the society as they struggle to live in dignity – especially within the political, economic and cultural spheres. The history of Guyana has demonstrated the importance of contexts in the introduction of institutions into society – whether these are in the political, economic or cultural spheres. The institutions will have to be seen as just. Rules that go against the values and morals of a people or lead to injustice, will be observed in the breach or not at all; the institution will at best be ignored or at worse lead to dysfunctional social behaviour.
In Guyana we would have to derive our substantive principles of justice for ourselves based on our history and present realities. Slavery and indentureship have been the two historical forces that have had the greatest impact on our collective psyche and our disparate cultures. Out of our experiences where they were denied, the values of liberty and equality are central to what we desire for the “good life”. These values must be central to any institution that seeks to address any aspect of our national life, including the ones proposed in this paper.
Federalism is founded on a conception of human nature that places these values at its centre and imbues all institutions within its framework. It is a way of organising society that balances the inevitable contradictory pulls of unity and diversity immanent in any agglomeration of humanity, but even more so, one as diverse as ours, and yet achieve justice in the groups of the society. As we try to achieve our self-defined goals of securing justice in cultural autonomy, and political and economic distribution, there is no alternative to adopting federalist principles to guide all proposed institutions.
ExxonM now warning us of a potential Tsunami and your leaders busy approving oil project
Apr 27, 2024
GCB T10 Blast tournament… Kaieteur Sports – T10 action continued yesterday at Malteenoes Ground with huge wins for Essequibo Anacondas and the Demerara Pitbulls. Anacondas beat Jaguars by...Kaieteur News – At a recent press conference Vice President, Bharrat Jagdeo, made a startling revelation. He indicated... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Waterfalls Magazine – On April 10, the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]