Latest update September 1st, 2024 12:25 AM
Jan 08, 2015 Letters
DEAR EDITOR,
In the November 15 – 21, 2014 edition of ‘The Economist’ magazine, an article was published on Guyana on page forty-four. The article was titled ‘A 60-year schism’. Firstly, it is good to know that Guyana attracted the attention of the Editors of ‘The Economist’. I guess in a magazine of this nature, any publicity is good for Guyana and I do believe that we can build on this interest by endeavouring to shift the reports more in the direction of what Guyana can become and how we plan to get there.
The article was quite accurate and what I found particularly interesting was the care to be balanced and a great awareness of the reporter and editors to the sensitivities of the issue being reported. But what else did I expect; it is ‘The Economist’ magazine.
Nevertheless, the article focused on the prorogation of parliament to avoid a no-confidence vote. It also went further to delve into the race-based politics and also hinted this as one of the reasons Guyana has remained relatively poor. Reference was also made of legislation which was not passed, such as the anti-money laundering bill; as well as the absence of local government elections since 1994. The article concluded with the sentence, ‘some Guyanese want to move beyond the stalemate’.
I wish to state that not only do we want to move beyond the stalemate; we are fed-up with the stalemate. What is particularly frustrating is the fact that Guyana has so much potential for growth and development, but has been caught in this seemingly never-ending unfortunate situation for 60 years.
Nonetheless, to the Editors of ‘The Economist’, as citizens we have realized that for too long we have left the development and the conceptualization and designing of our country and economy largely to our politicians, but that is changing; we are getting involved and want to be involved. We have a dream that by 2032 Guyana will become the Singapore of South America (some citizens are convinced that this can be realized before) and that Guyana will become the next hotspot for business and development in the Caribbean.
We will depend on ‘The Economist’ magazine to promote us and our efforts to attract credible investors and other international interest.
As citizens, we recognize for this to happen we need better governance – more transparency and accountability, better security, higher social capital, for instance better cohesion between the races and the political and other leadership, improved human capital and infrastructure and overall, a more functional economy, society and country. And we are committed to work towards achieving these and to hold our leaders accountable.
Finally, it is important to note that depending on how one views it, the no-confidence motion could be a good intervention for Guyana. In my view it is one of the best things that could happen to Guyana. There is a saying that ‘change comes either through something dramatic and/or from something traumatic’; the no-confidence motion is a bit of both.
For profound change to happen there is need for a trigger; after 60 years of this rift, Guyana and Guyanese needed a trigger with sufficient force to create an environment for real change. Since the no-confidence motion was tabled in parliament, a number of events and actions were triggered in Guyana at the individual, institutional and societal levels which would not have ordinarily been triggered otherwise.
So, keep an eye on our country and economy, this is indeed, our Finest Hour’.
Audreyanna Thomas
Mineral and oil rich country borrowing to feed, clothe and house its citizens.
Aug 31, 2024
Republic Bank Caribbean Premier League 2024… Kaieteur Sports – Defending champs Guyana Amazon Warriors opened their account with 3-wicket win over the Antigua & Barbuda Falcons during...Kaieteur News – There exists a weapon more insidious than the outright banning of dissenting voices. That weapon involves... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – There is an alarming surge in gun-related violence, particularly among younger... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]