Latest update May 1st, 2024 1:04 AM
Feb 12, 2020 Letters
DEAR EDITOR,
GAWU’s General Secretary Seepaul Narine as is being advised claimed that more pressing issues prevented a response earlier to his letter, “Lincoln, indeed these, as you put it, are …the hard, cold facts” (KN, Jan 29, 2020). The central issue of this discussion on sugar (GuySuCo), including the well-being of the workers and their communities, had to do with the role being played by our political operatives, namely the Government and Opposition.
Whereas it was made known, it cannot be said the Government did a stellar job in handling the issue, but the role of the Opposition – Bharrat Jagdeo as President and Leader of the Opposition – cannot be ignored, Seepaul seems discomfitted by the reference to the latter.
The President and Leader of the Opposition are the nation’s premier political leaders and must be held to account for their performance. It was posited President Jagdeo failed to put systems in place to ensure the industry’s viability, estates were shuttered during his tenure, and money was squandered, as with the US$200-plus million Skeldon Estate factory and European Union (EU) funding for diversification.
It was further said the present cries of the sugar workers did not see Jagdeo, as Leader of the Opposition, using his political privilege and muscle to lay before the nation a plan on moving the industry forward and/or seeking engagement with the government on the workers’ welfare, including the challenges to secure pay increase over the past years. I have argued he has let down the workers, many of whom support the PPP. This is a record Seepaul doesn’t want to honestly discuss, and is seeking to mask by engaging in diversion, semantics and deception.
Whereas he feels a political obligation to circle the wagon on the PPP/Jagdeo stewardship, I hold no such obligation. There is no need on my part to try to cover up, deny or exonerate any government or opposition. I am a trade unionist not a political activist or candidate, though my trade union interest may at times address matters of deep political concerns. It is unfortunate his political preference is guiding his response, whilst I acknowledge same.
It is one thing to use adjectives in efforts to describe my understanding of issues or to marshal additional or alternative information to refute my contention, but quite another to seek to malign me by engaging in deception. I will not tolerate it. The same nonsense was done in his initial response, where he sought to misrepresent my contention that “It is not being said that the Coalition Government has done a stellar job in handling the sugar industry” (KN, Jan 12, 2019). Seepaul interpreted that to mean, “We [GAWU] had to wonder where or what is this stellar job Mr. Lewis speaks about” (KN, Jan 15, 2020).
I corrected the misrepresentation, thinking it was an oversight, but it is evident the deception is either deliberate or designed to create public mischief. I won’t doubt it is the latter.
I never “question where it is said that the World Bank gave approval for Skeldon.” It was made known the role of the World Bank is to propose/recommend and it is left up to the country to accept. With regards to the bond issue, I am fully aware of the conditions under which it was secured, and contrary to Seepaul’s view, I am not “confused” neither what I said on this matter is “not true”.
Had he valued the totality of the article, instead he selectively quoted excerpts from, it would have been hard to ignore where it is stated:- “According to the Trust Deed signed on May 24, 2018 between NICIL and the Hand in Hand Trust Corporation Inc., ‘the net proceeds from the issue of the Bonds shall be applied exclusively by the Company towards financing of the Guyana Sugar Corporation’s long-term project and capital expenditure to acquire two co-generation plants, to upgrade existing factories to produce plantation white sugar, to build storage and packing facilities, as well as to contribute for two years towards general ongoing operational costs’” (GuySuCo receives $7.4B from $30B bond – 4th June 2019).
General operational cost – note the two years stipulation – means all factors involved in day-to-day production. On the issue of wages, the management will be expected where there is an increase, which will become a fixed cost, to make sure a mechanism is put in place to sustain it.
The context where Seepaul is arguing the bond be used for wages, is as though the money can just be taken out and go towards this without a plan, which is a stipulated condition for drawing down. He wants the bond – which is investors’ money – to be run the same way the PPP government managed the EU funding for diversification, which was to do whatever you want with it. It cannot happen so.
Lastly, it should be said since my last letter, the media reported the sugar unions and GuySuCo management have struck an agreement for wage increase through the acceptable process of collective bargaining. Indeed, this is testimony of persistency and proof that nothing is given to workers, they have to struggle to achieve better conditions of work, regardless of which party/group is in office.
Lincoln Lewis
Vice President’s response to the risk of a Tsunami.
May 01, 2024
Richmond United FC and Queenstown FC play out hard-fought draw Kaieteur Sports – The Guyana Football Federation (GFF) Regional Associations’ Senior Men’s League is back. Essequibo...Kaieteur News – At the recent cricket symposium, hosted in the twin-island republic of Trinidad and Tobago, the Prime... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Waterfalls Magazine – On April 10, the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]