The EPA's duty is to safeguard Guyana's environment and citizens' interests, not dilute operators' obligations

The EPA’s duty is to safeguard Guyana’s environment and citizens’ interests, not dilute operators’ obligations

Dec 25, 2024 Letters

Dear Editor,

The EPA’s December 22nd response to Dr Vincent Adams’ criticisms reflects poorly on its oversight role. Instead of addressing his substantive arguments, the EPA attempts to diminish his credibility through political labelling, disregarding his decades of environmental and engineering expertise.

The EPA’s parsing of “adequate” versus “unlimited” liability ignores both Justice Kissoon’s clear High Court ruling and its own selective omission of key permit text – “if EEPGL or its Co-Venturers fail to do so.” Their touted $2 billion liability floor misses the fundamental point: Guyanese citizens need absolute protection against environmental disaster costs, not arbitrary caps.

For some amount of assurance, it would be helpful if they could respond to the following critical questions arising from Article 28 of the 2016 Petroleum Agreement:

Has the EPA published any comprehensive standards for offshore petroleum operations in the eight years since signing?
What constitutes “reasonable notice” before ministerial intervention in pollution cleanup under Article 28.6?
Has it done or commissioned any independent assessment to evaluate whether the Agreement’s environmental provisions adequately protect Guyana, given today’s massive operational scale?
How does the EPA reconcile its stance with Article 28.4’s requirement for “all reasonable measures…to remedy” pollution?
What specific standards and protocols ensure compliance with Article 28.3’s environmental protection requirements?
Should the EPA not prioritise developing clear environmental standards over semantic debates about guarantee language?

As an observer of Guyana’s oil sector, I find it troubling that our environmental regulator advocates for weaker rather than stronger protections. The EPA’s duty is to safeguard Guyana’s environment and citizens’ interests, not dilute operators’ obligations through creative interpretation.

Sincerely,

Christopher Ram

Oil and Gas columnist

(The EPA’s duty is to safeguard Guyana’s environment and citizens’ interests, not dilute operators’ obligations)

2016 Petroleum Agreement, Dr. Vincent Adams, environmental disaster costs, EPA, Justice Kissoon's clear High Court

Latest News

The EPA’s duty is to safeguard Guyana’s environment and citizens’ interests, not dilute operators’ obligations

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| March, 31st, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Szeplaki wins LGC/ STP Investments Inc. Golf tournament

GBA Youth, Junior & Under-16 Boxing...

GBA recognises donation of Badminton gear to QC...

Exciting restart of the East Bank Football...

“Easily one of the worst decisions ever...

Harpy Eagles faces toughest challenge yet, as...

Features/Columnists

A coalition of shared disgrace

The U.S. “Joining” the Commonwealth: an unreasonable expectation

Better contract management, info flows

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

The EPA’s duty is to safeguard Guyana’s environment and citizens’ interests, not dilute operators’ obligations

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| March, 31st, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]