U.S. and U.K. Governments urged to amend Maritime Laws to allow private security on cargo ships in high-risk zones

Jul 08, 2024 Letters

---

Dear Editor,

I am writing to express my deep concern and frustration over the current regulations that restrict cargo ships from hiring private security when traveling through high-risk maritime zones, specifically off the coasts of Libya, Niger, and Somalia. The threat of piracy in these regions is not only a persistent menace but also a grave danger to international trade and the lives of those who operate these vessels. It is imperative that both the United States and United Kingdom governments amend their laws to allow for the proper protection of these ships.

The waters off Libya, Niger, and Somalia are notorious for pirate attacks. Despite international efforts to combat this scourge, piracy remains a significant threat. Pirates in these regions are well-armed and organised, often outgunning the minimal security measures that cargo ships are permitted. Current regulations only allow one firearm aboard a cargo ship, a woefully inadequate defense against heavily armed pirates. This leaves crew members vulnerable and the cargo at high risk.

While the United States Coast Guard (USCG) and His Majesty’s Coastguard (HMCG) provide support, their resources are stretched thin. Deploying warships to escort cargo vessels through these danger zones is not a sustainable solution. The response time for these warships to reach endangered ships can be extensive, often resulting in catastrophic outcomes before help arrives. This dependency on government assistance is both impractical and insufficient given the scale of the threat.

Allowing cargo ships to hire private security firms equipped to handle pirate threats is a practical and necessary measure. Private security teams are trained specifically for maritime defense and can offer immediate protection. These professionals would be far more effective in deterring and neutralising pirate attacks than the current, inadequate measures.

Moreover, the presence of armed security on board would serve as a significant deterrent to pirates. Knowing that a ship is well-defended would likely dissuade many would-be attackers, reducing the frequency and severity of piracy incidents. This proactive approach would not only protect the crew and cargo but also stabilise shipping routes, ensuring the continued flow of goods essential to global trade.

The economic implications of piracy are profound. Every year, millions of dollars are lost due to pirate attacks, with costs including ransom payments, stolen cargo, increased insurance premiums, and delays in shipping schedules. These costs ultimately trickle down to consumers, affecting global markets and economies. Allowing private security on cargo ships would significantly reduce these economic burdens by preventing many attacks before they occur.

Furthermore, the human cost cannot be overlooked. Crew members who fall victim to piracy face extreme danger, often being taken hostage and subjected to violence and inhumane conditions. The psychological trauma experienced by these individuals is immense. By providing adequate security, we can protect these workers and ensure their safety and well-being.

Other nations have recognised the necessity of private security on cargo ships and have adapted their laws accordingly. For instance, the Italian government allows for armed security personnel on its vessels, leading to a notable decrease in successful pirate attacks on Italian ships. It is high time that the United States and the United Kingdom follow suit and update their regulations.

Both countries have the means and the responsibility to lead by example in protecting maritime interests. By permitting private security firms to operate on cargo ships, they can significantly enhance the safety of international shipping lanes and reduce the burden on their naval forces.

The strategic implications of permitting private security on cargo ships extend beyond mere defense. It would signal a strong commitment by the U.S. and UK governments to safeguard international trade routes, reinforcing their leadership in global maritime security. This policy shift could enhance diplomatic relations with other nations that share these waters and face similar piracy threats. By collaborating with these countries to standardise private security regulations, a unified front against piracy can be established.

One of the main objections to allowing private security on cargo ships revolves around legal and regulatory concerns. Critics argue that the presence of armed personnel could escalate conflicts and complicate legal accountability in the event of an incident. However, these concerns can be effectively managed through stringent regulations and oversight.

For instance, private security firms must adhere to strict guidelines regarding the use of force, ensuring that their actions are defensive and proportionate. Additionally, comprehensive training and certification programs for private security personnel can be implemented to ensure they operate within international legal frameworks and maritime laws.

The development of clear, standardised rules of engagement, coupled with robust monitoring and reporting mechanisms, will mitigate the risks associated with armed security on cargo ships. Such measures will also reassure the international community that private security personnel are held to high standards of conduct and accountability.

In addition to human security, the incorporation of advanced technology can further enhance the safety of cargo ships. Drones, surveillance systems, and automated defense mechanisms can complement the efforts of private security teams. These technologies can provide early warnings of potential pirate threats, enabling preemptive actions that reduce the likelihood of successful attacks.

Governments can support the adoption of these technologies by offering incentives or subsidies to shipping companies willing to invest in state-of-the-art security systems. By fostering innovation and the implementation of advanced security measures, the maritime industry can stay ahead of the evolving tactics of modern pirates.

Allowing private security on cargo ships is not just a security measure; it is also a cost-effective strategy. The initial investment in private security teams and advanced technologies may seem substantial, but it pales in comparison to the economic losses incurred from pirate attacks. Reduced insurance premiums, fewer ransoms, and the uninterrupted flow of goods will offset these costs over time.

Moreover, this policy could create a new sector within the maritime industry, providing jobs and economic opportunities for those trained in maritime security. The growth of this sector would not only enhance the overall security of international shipping lanes but also contribute positively to the economies of the U.S. and UK.

Examining case studies where private security has been successfully implemented can provide valuable insights and reinforce the argument for policy change. The Italian model, as previously mentioned, serves as a pertinent example. Italian ships have experienced fewer pirate attacks since the government allowed private security teams on board. This success can be attributed to well-regulated security practices and the deterrent effect of having armed personnel on ships.

Another notable example is the use of private security in the Indian Ocean. Several shipping companies operating in this region have reported a significant decline in piracy incidents since employing private security firms. These success stories demonstrate that with the right regulations and support, private security can effectively safeguard maritime interests.

To bring about the necessary changes, coordinated efforts and advocacy are required. Here are several policy recommendations for the U.S. and UK governments to consider:

1. Amend Existing Legislation – Update laws to allow the hiring of private security firms by cargo ships traveling through high-risk areas.
2. Establish Regulatory Frameworks – Develop clear regulations and guidelines for the operation of private security teams on cargo ships, including rules of engagement and accountability measures.
3. Promote International Collaboration – Work with other nations and international organisations to create standardised practices for maritime security, ensuring a unified and effective approach to combating piracy.
4. Encourage Technological Innovation – Provide incentives for shipping companies to adopt advanced security technologies, enhancing both human and technological defenses against piracy.
5. Monitor and Evaluate – Implement robust monitoring and evaluation systems to assess the effectiveness of private security measures and make adjustments as needed.

The threat of piracy in regions such as Libya, Niger, and Somalia demands a proactive and comprehensive response. The current restrictions on private security for cargo ships are inadequate and place unnecessary risks on the maritime industry. By amending laws to allow private security, the U.S. and UK governments can provide immediate and effective protection for ships, crew members, and cargo. This change is not only a matter of security but also an economic and humanitarian imperative.

The time for action is now. It is essential to adapt our policies to meet the realities of the current maritime threat landscape. I urge the relevant authorities to prioritise this issue and take the necessary steps to protect our global maritime interests.

Sincerely,
Wayne Lyttle 

 

---

• Libya, Moreover, neutralising, Niger, organisations, successful, United States Coast Guard, Wayne Lyttle

---