Having a stronger military presence may be preferred approach to ensuring border integrity

Jan 14, 2021 Letters

Dear Editor,

In light of the USA’s announcement that they will support the ICJ process and that they have no interest in establishing a military base near the Venezuelan border it is then up to the current Administration and Parliament to do what’s best in our national interest within our current capabilities. We must remember that the USA in recent years had rejected the authority of the ICJ, so we must proceed with caution. If they have shifted their position back to recognizing the ICJ then we hope that it is a permanent change that does not hinge upon changing circumstances and convenience. The USA was supporting Guaidó who holds a similar position on Essequibo and our oil is a drop in the bucket when compared to the oil reserves of Venezuela.

When the battle over Ankoko Island had occurred in 1966 and 1970 the USA’s preference was to lead the mediation process with Venezuela and if it were not for the UK’s historical intervention we would not have the necessary leverage we have today. Therefore, we must continue to explore the options before us to ensure no advance by Venezuela can be easily made to take the remainder of Ankoko Island. By having a stronger military presence, with or without an ally on the Island may be the preferred approach to ensuring the integrity of the border. An invitation to the USA or the UK to conduct joint training exercises on our half of the Island may be one of the next best steps forward, but establishing a strengthened position via improved military capabilities at the border is necessary to aid in deterring further incursions. We must learn from our history.

Yours truly,
Mr. Jamil Changlee