By Kiana Wilburg
Time is one of the strongest negotiating tools a country could have against an oil company. But, according to former Petroleum Advisor to the coalition administration, Dr. Jan Mangal, Guyana forfeited that leverage by being in a rush to first oil before General and Regional Elections originally scheduled for 2020.
What also made matters worse in Dr. Mangal’s view is the fact that the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), which initially had full responsibility for preparing Guyana for the oil sector, seemed intent on making decisions, which only favoured the oil companies.
The Oil and Gas Consultant made this pellucid as he sought to provide some perspective on the role the Ministry played in Guyana now being unprepared for the oil sector.
“Firstly, Guyana lost negotiating leverage against Exxon, because Guyana was in a rush to get first oil before the originally scheduled elections in 2020. Secondly, by Guyana rushing, Guyana also forfeited the opportunity to develop its institutional capacity for oil and gas. By rushing, Guyana was setting itself up to fail in its preparations for oil and gas,” Dr. Mangal asserted.
In this regard, the consultant highlighted the fact that for three years, the MNR did not hire a single oil and gas professional with appropriate experience in deepwater developments and production.
“This is quite amazing, as the MNR and other ministries should have hired dozens of highly experienced oil and gas professionals. But none was hired. This is a blatant sign that some Government officials were favouring the interests of the oil companies, knowingly or unknowingly, over the interests of Guyanese, since the oil companies benefit when the country knows nothing about oil and gas,” Mangal emphasised.
He continued, “And there were other decisions. The MNR hired a firm to review the Field Development Plan (FDP) for the Liza 1 Project, but the firm was a small facilities engineering firm, which had probably never reviewed a whole FDP for a country. The firm had no competence in geology and reservoir engineering, and the firm could not review the costs of the project. Please remember, oil companies do not want countries to hire competent professionals and contractors, since these professionals might advance the country’s interests over the oil company’s interests.”
Dr. Mangal added, “Then we saw suspicious things like the courtship of a Nigerian-American Oil and Gas billionaire whose company was caught up in illegal smuggling of gold in the Congo, and whose company was fined US$32 million by US authorities. And the MNR proposed that Guyana consider sole sourcing the contract for oil sales to a notorious company named Glencore. The list goes on, but I will end it here.”
Further to this, the consultant said that some of the international donors and agencies, like the World Bank and Chatham House, were well aware of the situation “but I cannot recall any of them ringing alarm bells.”
Dr. Mangal said that this in particular, was an eye-opener for him, because previously, he held these international bodies in high esteem. “But now I am convinced most of these international bodies are just along for the ride,” the former Government Advisor said.
Due to the lack of progress by the MNR in improving institutional capacity, preparing Guyana for oil, and due to sloth in some other ministries, Dr. Mangal said it was clear that Guyana needed a new entity responsible for all of energy (oil, gas, renewables, etc). It was on this premise, he pointed out, that President David Granger took the bold and critical decision to setup the new Department of Energy.
Jan 19, 2019By Sean Devers The Berbician pace pair of Clinton Pestano and Romario Shepherd shared seven wickets between on a truncated second day of the fifth round of 2019 Regional First-Class cricket...
Jan 19, 2019
Jan 19, 2019
Jan 19, 2019
Jan 19, 2019
Jan 18, 2019
Editor’s Note, If your sent letter was not published and you felt its contents were valid and devoid of libel or personal attacks, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]