By Feona Morrison
“There is absolutely no evidence; no case for him to answer to,” said Magistrate Judy Latchman before discharging Regan Rodrigues again for the murder of political activist, Courtney Crum-Ewing. It was an emotional moment for Rodrigues, also known as ‘Grey Boy’.
The 33-year-old man dropped to his knees and cried when Magistrate Latchman told him he was free to go. “Freedom, Freedom,” he was heard shouting while sitting in the Police Outpost at the Georgetown Magistrates’ Courts.
The Preliminary Inquiry into the matter concluded yesterday during which Magistrate Latchman ruled that a prima facie case was not made out against Rodrigues at the close of the prosecution’s case. Attorney-at-Law Nigel Hughes represented the prosecution.
During a synopsis of the evidence, the Magistrate said that while the court was satisfied that Crum-Ewing was shot with a gun retrieved from a house which was occupied by Rodrigues at Riverview, Ruimveldt. there was no evidence that Rodrigues “used the gun, pulled the trigger and shot Crum-Ewing.”
Crum –Ewing died as a result of haemorrhage and shock due to multiple gunshot wounds.
This was supported by the evidence of Government Pathologist Dr. Nehaul Singh who testified that Crum-Ewing received five gunshot wounds– one of which was at close range.
The Magistrate said that the court believed that Crum-Ewing died as a result of gunshot wounds.
Fourteen oral statements given to police by Rodrigues were admitted to form part and parcel of evidence in the matter by Magistrate Latchman. However, the Magistrate ruled that these oral statements did not implicate Rodrigues in the murder.
Magistrate Latchman handed down her ruling in a packed courtroom. The spectators included the parents of Crum-Ewing.
“There is no evidence; absolutely no evidence…,” Magistrate Latchman noted during which Crum-Ewing’s mother expressed her disappointment by walking out of the courtroom.
Prior to the Magistrate’s ruling, Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) Mitchell Caesar, who is the head of the Major Crimes Investigation Unit, was called to testify.
On May 26, Magistrate Latchman had warned Prosecutor Hughes that he would have to close his case on the next occasion (yesterday). This was because of the continuous absence of ASP Caesar.
ASP Caesar was absent on at least four occasions May 3, May 11, May 17 and May 25. He was said to be out of the country in one instance.
At an April 26 court hearing ASP Caesar refused to continue testifying in the Preliminary Inquiry after Rodrigues hurled a series of derogatory remarks at him.
ASP Caesar subsequently told Magistrate Judy Latchman that he would not tolerate being disrespected by Rodrigues, and left the witness box. Magistrate Latchman instructed ASP Caesar to step outside the courtroom while she and other police ranks and even the prosecutor tried to compose an outraged Rodrigues.
However, when the matter resumed the police witness was nowhere to be found. His name was summoned thrice by the orderly but went unanswered
Magistrate Latchman rebuked ASP Caesar for disobeying her instructions to not leave the court compound, given the fact that he is a senior police officer.
Yesterday, Caesar recounted a confrontation that was held between himself, Rodrigues and Inspector Singh at the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Headquarters, Eve Leary, Georgetown.
Prosecutor Hughes then requested the court to make a ruling on all oral statements.
The statements were read out loud by Magistrate Latchman. Rodrigues denied ever giving such statements to the police. The Magistrate then ruled that the statements were freely and voluntarily made. At the close of the prosecution’s case, Rodrigues said, “I know me ain’t do nothing.”
Rodrigues was discharged in January on this same murder charge by Magistrate Latchman.
During her ruling back then, Magistrate Latchman discharged the murder charge against Rodrigues citing insufficient evidence.
Magistrate Latchman had pointed out that one of the court’s reasons for discharging the matter was because there was no evidence to support that the firearm tendered during the preliminary inquiry was used by Rodrigues to kill the political activist, although she believed the gun, a .32 revolver, was confiscated by police during a raid at Rodrigues’s home.
The prosecution’s inability to make out a prima facie was once again highlighted when the Magistrate disclosed that the prosecutor failed to request the court to rule on the admissibility of caution statements allegedly made by Rodrigues. While stating that several inferences can be drawn from those statements, Magistrate Latchman underscored that they did not implicate Rodrigues in the murder of Crum-Ewing.
The bullet-riddled body of Crum-Ewing was found at Third Avenue, Diamond New Scheme East Bank Demerara on March 10, 2015. The 40-year-old was shot twice to the temple, once to the back of the head and twice to the stomach.
The police in a statement had said that the political activist was accosted by four men in a car, one of whom discharged several rounds, hitting him about the body. It was reported that the killer(s) used a .32 pistol to execute Crum-Ewing. The political activist was well known for his one-man protest outside the office of former Attorney General (AG) Anil Nandlall.
Minutes before he was gunned down, he was reportedly heard via bullhorn urging residents of the nieghbourhood to vote against then ruling party PPP/C.
On January 11, 2016 Rodrigues was jailed for three years by Magistrate Fabayo Azore after he was found guilty on a charge of escaping from lawful custody.
On July 13, 2015 at River View Ruimveldt, while in the custody of a police constable pending charges for unlawful possession of a firearm and ammunition, he escaped.
According to facts presented in court, on the day in question, police performing raid exercise went to the home of Rodrigues. At the time, he was at home and permitted the police to search the premises. A gun was found under a chair in the home.
As a result, Rodrigues was arrested by lawmen.
While being escorted to the police station, he pushed the arresting officer down and made good his escape. Police saw him the following day in the vicinity of the CID Headquarters and arrested him. Rodrigues was also charged for possession of illegal firearm and ammunition.
But the charges were dismissed against him by Magistrate Azore due to insufficient evidence.
Nov 12, 2018By Franklin Wilson in Florida, USA Compliments of Industrial Safety Supplies, Secure Innovation & Concepts and Fitness Express Despite suffering three losses in their previous matches and being...
Nov 12, 2018
Nov 12, 2018
Nov 12, 2018
Nov 11, 2018
Nov 11, 2018
Editor’s Note, If your sent letter was not published and you felt its contents were valid and devoid of libel or personal attacks, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]