Latest update April 25th, 2024 12:59 AM
Feb 06, 2017 Letters
Dear Editor,
I wish to support the excellent letter written by Dr. David Hinds in KN of 1/2/17 making a strong case against terminating the services of proficient and effective officials on the basis of their age, irrespective of their competencies.
As a long serving international Human Resource Management professional (and as one who is already past the biblical ‘three score years & ten’ but still gainfully employed, thank God!), I can attest to the fact that age is not necessarily a measure of someone’s ability to perform well.
Indeed, there are numerous examples of persons in their 50’s and 60’s who are already mentally and physically ‘challenged’ if not ‘retired’, while there are others who are decades older but still performing optimally.
The challenge is to assess persons based on objective appraisals of their performance and potential without undue consideration of their date of birth.
This is especially important in our Guyana context where there is no surfeit of skilled and effective persons and where the dearth of suitable technical and professional persons is likely to become more acute in the coming years.
Why put out some of our skilled and effective Guyanese professionals to pasture on the questionable pretext of age while retaining even older others who are not necessarily more effective; in any event there is no proof that they are denying opportunities for younger compatriots!
Nowrang Persaud
Jagdeo giving Exxon 102 cent to collect 2 cent.
Apr 25, 2024
By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – The French Diplomatic Office in Guyana, in collaboration with the Guyana Olympic Association and UNICEF, hosted an exhibition on Tuesday evening at the...Kaieteur News – Dr. Bharrat Jagdeo, the General Secretary of the People’s Progressive Party, persists in offering... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Waterfalls Magazine – On April 10, the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]