Latest update March 28th, 2024 12:59 AM
Aug 03, 2016 Letters
Dear Editor,
It is to me a ludicrous situation in this “civilised” age that we should even have a debate about the justification of a system by which the death penalty is administered by those who purport to have the power to enact and enforce the laws that control our societal affairs.
With the benefit of so much scientific knowledge, extensive research and historical experience at our disposal, and the wisdom and reason which should have resulted from these, it is only logical to assume that human beings would have become so enlightened as to have already rejected this barbaric practice in the administration of justice. Added to this, the oft-quoted truism that “violence begets violence” seems only to be applied when it suits our purpose at getting others to adopt a culture of peacefulness.
I proffer now that, unless we believe and act accordingly that NO HUMAN BEING has the right to take another’s life, war, murder and other forms of violence would always be there to blight our existence and obstruct any other efforts at creating a world of peace and justice. Unless we accept that love and respect for the life of every other human being, with the concomitant qualities of empathy and desire to help, inform the response to all our problems, then we shall continue to live in imbalance and strife, no matter what progress we make in economic and all other areas of our living.
Is it not reasonable to accept that the justice system must be naturally more reformative than punitive? The persons who perpetrate murder and other criminal acts, are they not products of our own society to whom we owe at least the obligation to assist them to reform themselves into useful human beings? Does anyone or any society have the right to condemn any of its own without giving them the opportunity for this reform? Are we as a result saying that we do not possess, especially when we have criminals in our total custody for any period of time, the will and the means to facilitate such reform?
In this effort to expedite the solution to this brutal practice, which I feel was simply inherited from the more “advanced countries”, please let us use our natural qualities of love, fairness and empathy. Our humanity and Guyanese bigheartedness would be severely marred if we don’t.
Roy Paul.
Comments are closed.
THIS IDIOT TELLING GUYANA WE HAVE NO SAY IN THE 50% PROFIT SHARING AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH EXXON.
Mar 28, 2024
Minister Ramson challenge athletes to better last year’s performance By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – Guyana’s 23-member contingent for the CARIFTA Games in Grenada is set to depart the...B.V. Police Station Kaieteur News – The Beterverwagting Police Station, East Coast Demerara (ECD) will be reconstructed... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – In the face of escalating global environmental challenges, water scarcity and... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]
“In this effort to expedite the solution to this brutal practice, which I feel was simply inherited from the more “advanced countries”, please let us use our natural qualities of love, fairness and empathy.”
With hundreds to choose from I need cite only one instance; the brutish criminals who burnt alive the couple in their house.
Firstly I fail to see the death sentence in this case as in any way ‘brutal’, they’ve more than earned it.
And secondly I completely fail to see any of the claimed *natural* qualities of love, fairness and empathy in their deeds.
Really? Wake up.