By Dr. Rudi V. Webster
Recently, I read a book about the maiden voyage of the Titanic. On the ill-fated night that the Titanic
sank it received five clear warnings from other ships about icebergs in the area. The overconfident captain who believed that his ship was unsinkable ignored the warnings, refused to change course or take corrective action, and the ship hit an iceberg. You know the rest of the story.
Many a captain has gone down with his ship because he refused to listen to objective feedback and take remedial action. Rejection of such feedback and an unwillingness to be flexible and adaptive often result in great disasters.
Over the years, the West Indies Cricket Board (WICB) was given clear warnings of the great dangers ahead in the Lucky, Patterson, Wilkin and Caricom reports. These four reports gave similar feedback but in the Caricom report the feedback was more urgent and direct. Like the captain of the Titanic, the leaders of the WICB rejected this feedback, did not take corrective action and are now headed for a disaster of Titanic proportions. Sadly, the WICB did not just dismiss the findings in the last report but it did so in a manner that showed gross disrespect for the prime ministers of the region and the eminent persons on the Committee.
The captain of the Titanic ignored the last warning and basically hinted and signaled back, “Don’t bother us. Who the hell are you to tell us anything?” Similarly, the president and Board signaled the prime ministers that they didn’t need their advice, just their money. They stressed that the Board would make its own decisions and do what it has to do without interference from government. There is one great difference between the Titanic and the WICB that made the Board’s decision dangerously reckless. Before the Titanic went down it was in pristine condition; the WICB was already a sinking ship.
In life we all need correct feedback to monitor progress and adjust our strategy and direction on the way to our goals. Pompous and overconfident leaders often lose purpose and direction and perform poorly because they become experts at denying objective feedback. If they don’t like the picture, they deny the feedback.
Sir Garfield Sobers once told me that the main difference between great players and the others is the capacity to consistently identify the demands and challenges in the situations they face and the ability to tailor their skills, resources and strategies to fit those demands. Here Sir Garfield stresses the importance of purpose and ’fit’ as well as the significance of awareness, objective feedback, flexibility and responsibility.
A case is being made that Dave Cameron could possibly be the Board’s most overconfident, inflexible and arrogant president. Experts tell us that overconfidence is psychological fraud and a prescription for disaster. Over-confident leaders think they are better than they really are. They usually overestimate their power, importance and ability and underestimate that of other people. They put themselves on a pedestal and believe that they are king. With that mindset they behave recklessly, foolishly and selfishly and eventually pay a heavy price.
For selfish and personal reasons, Board members seem intent on breaking up the fabric of West Indies cricket and destroying the outstanding legacy of our great cricketers and great teams. I was very hurt to see Sir Garfield Sobers in tears when he was asked about the state of West Indies cricket a few months ago. Sir Garfield and the other legends are hurting.
For decades West Indies teams received worldwide adulation, recognition and public acclamation. Even Nelson Mandela was a keen supporter. He admitted that when he was in jail in Robben Island he followed the West Indies team and got confidence and great pride and satisfaction from the team’s triumphs.
It would be a tragedy if administrators who have contributed little or nothing to the success of West Indies cricket could knowingly and intentionally destroy everything that our great stars and warriors achieved on and off the cricket field. And indeed, everything else that past administrators fought for since 1928.
When countries run into economic difficulties they go to the IMF and World Bank for help. These institutions then place them on structural adjustment programmes to reform their economies and improve their growth and economic performance. About a year ago I jokingly said that the ICC should have the power to intervene in extreme circumstances and place poorly functioning member states under structural adjustment programmes.
Recently, Steve Waugh a former Australian captain floated the same idea. He said that the world rugby body would not allow the champion All Blacks of New Zealand to go down the same path that the West Indies has recently traveled.
It is clear that the WICB will not change. Caribbean governments should now tell the WICB that they no longer wish to have any dealings with them and should start looking for other options to save West Indies cricket.
Perhaps they should turn to the ICC for help and guidance and let that body know exactly how they feel about the WICB and what they would like to see as an alternative.
Aug 24, 2019By Sean Devers The penultimate day of the 2019 Senior CASA Squash Championships at the Georgetown Club’s Squash Courts in Guyana yesterday saw a couple of victories for the Guyanese Women and a...
U.S. President Donald Trump’s new rule on immigration and nationality, published on Monday, August 12, is not different... more
Editor’s Note, If your sent letter was not published and you felt its contents were valid and devoid of libel or personal attacks, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]