Latest update April 12th, 2026 12:50 AM
The PPP is running a politically-themed séance
DEAR EDITOR,
I had just turned 12 years old, only a few months older than my son is now, when the People’s Progressive Party/Civic came to power in 1992. My primary experience with suppression of dissent, of institutional racism, of blatant corruption, of the state-sponsored murder and torture of citizens, of nepotistic incompetence in public office, and of poor public infrastructure and services didn’t happen before 1992, but in the 23 years since.
On a personal level, the PNC of 1984 did not clandestinely threaten my income because I made a case of incompetence and a lack of accountability against one of its Ministers; the PPP of 2014 did that.
That said, I am willing to forgive, to listen to what the PPP has to say that is progressive, that is forward thinking, that is inclusive. I am waiting for a policy on youth or culture or equitable economic growth or combatting corruption, but instead what I keep getting is a rearview mirror on the PNC years. For example, on Saturday you had stories in the Chronicle in which both Gail Teixeira and Donald Ramotar were referring to the events of the Burnham era and warning against their return. On social media, PPP pages and accounts are popping up presenting the sort of ultra-murderous and ‘Dark Age’ view of that time that even Burnham’s worst critics would fail to recognize.
The PPP is not so much running a campaign as it is running a politically-themed séance, resurrecting and pitting itself against the ghost of a long dead Forbes Burnham. But then again, even outside of Burnham, there is of course no limit, no barrier of decency restraining its shameless exploitation of the dead.
When PPP people attended and spewed divisive hatred at a Lusignan Massacre Memorial, it was shameless exploitation of the dead. When this weekend, the PPP controlled Guyana Chronicle published an article claiming that news of the APNU/AFC Coalition caused a 67-year-old man to suffer a fatal heart at a bottom-house meeting held by the PPP’s Neil Kumar, it was a shameless exploitation of the dead.
The Coalition is now set, with a President candidate, David Granger and a Prime Ministerial candidate, Moses Nagamootoo. Instead of speaking simplistically about the penalties attached to the possession of bread 30 years ago, Donald Ramotar should have the courage to invite Granger on national television and radio to debate his record as President over the past three years, or even that of his predecessor in the previous ten. Cowardly abuse of the state media and a refusal to openly debate cannot be a winning strategy for the PPP at this critical time.
Ruel Johnson
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.