Latest update March 28th, 2024 12:59 AM
Dec 12, 2014 Letters
Dear Editor,
I refer to a letter in the SN of Dec 9, 2014 – “This is the perfect time for young people to take a stand.” The letter has a non-identifiable signature. That letter should not have been published because whereas it expresses the views of a reader, it has no journalistic value in terms of an editor’s role, not only in obligation to the media but to the wider society itself.
From the time I entered the media in 1988, I have always stressed there are very few circumstances in which an anonymous columnist and/or letter-writer can be justified. There is only one reason for a pen-name commentator in the print media – a whistle blower who can come to harm. Outside of this situation, the print media should not permit a commentator whose viewpoints are contained in an all-inclusive methodology.
It is simply morally unacceptable for a nameless person to be condemning others while hiding his/her identify. This is where social media becomes dangerous. You can start a web site without legal identification of ownership and accuse your former boss of terrible crimes because you were caught stealing and were dismissed. No one knows who you are.
Modern newspapers should not allow for pen name writers who compose essays on all types of subjects, including analyses of public figures. I may be wrong, but that anomaly no longer obtains in the print media. In 1990, while a columnist at the Catholic Standard, I came across an unpublished letter that the editor Father Morrison was about to print.
Penned by a retired public servant, Basil Collins of Duncan Street (deceased), the letter advocated that there should be a general strike by civil servants against the Hoyte Government. Mr. Collins appealed to public servants to be brave and join the picket line even if arrest or loss of employment follows.
He signed his name as “Observer.” I accused Mr. Collins of crass dishonest and immoral behaviour. On my side, I had the support of deputy editor, Colin Smith, who told Father Morison that Collins was asking people to be brave while hiding. It is one of my moments in journalism that Colin and I always reflect on. I will never forget that incident because it helped shape my attitude to editing
In that letter in the Stabroek, the person wrote; “…this is the perfect time for the young people of this country to take a stand. To let those in power recognize that we are no longer going to allow Guyana to be controlled by persons who do not have the best interest of the country at heart. That we are not going to allow race and class to dictate the decisions that are being made for our country and that we as youth intend to have a vital input in how the Cooperative Republic of Guyana moves forward.” (end of quote)
The moral contradiction is glaring there. This is an advocacy statement in which the person is afraid to be part of his/her own advocacy. That person has not taken a stand because no one knows that. Even if the editor knows the name of the writer, the society doesn’t and the writer is asking the society to be openly brave. In discussing this aberration with Adam Harris, I told him one should not advocate the use of mango leaves for hearth reasons when you don’t use it. You are bound to be seen a hypocritical. Harris agreed
Finally, both the Stabroek News and Kaieteur News have continuously warned letter-writers to identify themselves through submission of some piece of evidence, yet both newspapers have consistently ignored their own guidelines. M. Maxwell and Sultan Mohamed are fictional signatures.
It is simply unbelievable that editors at Kaieteur News and the Stabroek News continue to publish correspondences with these phantom names. It is simply unbelievably that Mr. Vishu Bisram could write often to these two newspapers and say NACTA has done a poll when there is absolutely no evidence anywhere in the world that a polling organization exists by the name of NACTA and the newspapers and the Guyanese society know that.
The role of the editor in the light of that information has a duty to journalistic integrity to omit the name NACTA and simply retain Mr. Bisram’s name because Mr. Bisram exists; he is real. But should we be surprised? No! There isn’t anything that should surprise us in a country named Guyana.
Frederick Kissoon
THIS IDIOT TELLING GUYANA WE HAVE NO SAY IN THE 50% PROFIT SHARING AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH EXXON.
Mar 28, 2024
Minister Ramson challenge athletes to better last year’s performance By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – Guyana’s 23-member contingent for the CARIFTA Games in Grenada is set to depart the...B.V. Police Station Kaieteur News – The Beterverwagting Police Station, East Coast Demerara (ECD) will be reconstructed... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – In the face of escalating global environmental challenges, water scarcity and... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]