Latest update April 18th, 2024 12:59 AM
Oct 05, 2014 Letters
Dear Editor,
The CARICOM Reparations process has gone miles beyond the debate of whether to pursue reparations or not. Yet Mr. Abu Bakr seems to have been left at the train station or missed the elevator and remains mentally stranded on the ground.
In his recent missive addressing Mr. Cedric Joseph’s fact based letter (SN October 30 , Mr. Abu Bakr responds by indicating “Joseph’s letter evades the issue of whom should pay reparations to whom”.
Why Mr. Abu Bakr wants Mr. Joseph to pronounce on which of the eight European Countries should pay reparations to Africans in the same way Germany was forced to pay reparations to Israel, is hidden in the arguments his letter makes.
His first argument is the 6 for 9 argument that Africans sold Africans and therefore African should not receive Reparations from Europe or should Reparations (to whom?).
This non-issue seems to have imprisoned Mr. Abu Bakr’s thought processes for Mr. Bakr fully well knows Africans did not practice chattel slavery, did not create chattel slavery and did not run the 400 year criminal enterprise called “a crime against humanity” at the 2001 United Nations Sponsored Durban Conference.
Given Mr. Abu Bakr is a person of considerable intellect, there seems to be a legal disconnectabout thereason why Europeans should pay reparations for the crime of chattel slavery which was state sponsored, church sponsored, private sector sponsored and which wasand is criminal enrichment.
I am certain the ordinary illiterate in the street would know that it is not the person who sold the gun, but the criminal who used the gun to kill, rape and plunder, who would be held criminally responsible.
I guess Mr. Bakr has his own reasons for this personal amnesia and cognitive dissonance.
The second point raised by Mr. Abu Bakr is an attempt, much like one of his earlier letters, to embed racism into the local reparations debate in Guyana. The quintessential “divide and conquer” Euorpean governance philosophy.
I doubt Mr. Bakr writes on reparations in the Trinidad or Jamaican media so I must conclude his efforts and knowledge are about the dynamics of Guyana.
Hence as Mr. Bakr introduces racism or discrimination by writing “So, in the Reparations talk there is this strange absence of the other victims. It would appear to me that the African activists leading the charge are, as usual, guilty of the same crimes of which they accuse the White Man, a self-serving ethnocentricty as unconscionable in its blindness as the ills they decry. “ I am puzzled by theenlightened idiocy of this statement by Mr. Abu Bakr given his deep interest in Guyana and his knowledge that the issue of “reparations” isaddressed by a Government of Guyana appointedReparations Committee in which the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs, a government controlled and managed ministry, was invited on many occasions to be a part of the Guyana National Committee since September 2013. I am sure he knows there has been no response from the Minister of Amerindian Affairs to the numerous letters and approaches made.
Why Mr. Abu Bakr doesn’t write to the Editor asking the said Minister why no participation is a mystery unless one wants to create public mischief as his letter suggests.
Perhaps Mr. Abu Bar already knows (I am sure of this) that the Indigenous experience in Guyana was very different form the Indigenous experience in St Vincent (Garifuna) and other Islands. Perhaps Mr. Abu Bakr knows the 80,000 Indigenous population in Guyana have already received 15% of Guyana and are perhaps satisfied with this. Perhaps Mr. Abu Bakr may know the injustice of the 15% of the land given to them by law which denies them their legitimate economic rights because the minerals below these lands are owned by the State.
So Mr. Bakr, there is no African racism or ethnocentricity as you have said. Change your mindset. It unbecoming of you. Or perhaps not. Neither am I aggrieved by your antics in this area.
Finally, Mr Bakr states in his response to Mr. Joseph’s brilliant factual letter “In sum, seeking a big British law firm is okay, but we have to allow into our midst our own devil’s advocates to anticipate and examine the counter-arguments our case will meet in any tribunal. Dismissing this process, as happened when Afro-American scholar Henry Louis Gates was pilloried for saying things (that Africans were involved in the slave trade) unacceptable to the mythified narrative some Blacks prefer, is to reduce us to an unthinking mob. For that there would be volunteers, but there cannot be conscripts”.
That Africans sold Africans, there is no debate or denial. But the Reparations Movement and Case is for “crimes against humanity” for Indigenous Genocide and African Slavery in the Caribbean.
It seems as if Mr. Abu Bakr feels left out of the debate and wants to be officially invited into the debate. Stating, however, that Africans are to pay Africans reparations by presenting the trivial idea , namely: “ Africans visited Brazil to look at the slave plantations, or Europe to look at the cities, (and) still kept shipping them out. Preparing them, it could be said, to lay claims to reparations in the soon future. “…….is a logic not heard by reasonable people. The question then becomes 1) Whom were these Africans? 2) How many were they? 3) Whose ship did they travel on? 4) How did they return to Africa? 5) How did they share this information about bad white Men with other Africans in this vast land without telecommunications or airplanes or fast boats”…….these defy the logic of Mr. Abu Bakr’s argumentand therefore lends question to his sincerity.
That CARICOM and individual sovereign states will pursue the process of reparation is a fact.
That National Committees welcome inputs, this too is a fact (Guyana has open meetings every Thursday attended by 30 plus people of all walks of life).
Next week (Oct 12-15) the 2nd Annual CARICOM Reparations Conference in Antigua will be held with the theme”An Experts Conference on Caribbean Reparation: scientific engagement and community mobilization”.
Invitees include Congressman John Conyers (USA) , Hon. PJ Patterson (former PM of Jamaica); Dr. Julius Garvey (son of Marcus Garvey); Lord Anthony Gifford (former Member of the Group of Eminent Persons on Reparations; Sister Esther (UK) and several Prime Ministers.
Perhaps, Brother Abu Bakr may wish to attend the Conference and share his valuable insights with the Experts over a 4 day period.
2015 is the beginning of the United Nations decade for People of African descent and Reparations is a key theme. As Sir Hilary Beckles puts it” “This is the century that will be known for reparatory justice”.
Eric Phillips
JAGDEO ADDING MORE DANGER TO GUYANA AND THE REGION
Apr 18, 2024
SportsMax – West Indies captain Hayley Matthews has been named Wisden’s leading Twenty20 Cricketer for 2023, as she topped all and sundry, including her male counterparts. Alan Gardner looks...Kaieteur News – Compliments of the Ministry of Education, our secondary school children are being treated to a stage... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Waterfalls Magazine – On April 10, the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]