Apr 28, 2012 Letters
When I read a release from the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) on Wednesday night that the CCJ welcomes the plan by Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister, Kamla Persad-Bissessar to withdraw from the Privy Council and accede to the CCJ Appellate Jurisdiction, I was very happy, since I got the impression that the twin island republic would sever all connections with the London-based Privy Council.
However, unfortunately this is not the case, the T&T Prime Minister said that she will introduce legislation to remove the Privy Council as the final court only in criminal matters, and civil appeals will still be determined by the British-based Court. This I find not only unusual, but confusing. It is like having one foot in and the other out.
Kamla Persad-Bissessar said that she has decided on the move following discussions she had with her counterpart at the recently concluded CARICOM meeting in Suriname. She added that she had given an undertaking to the other heads of government that she would approach the issue on her return to Port of Spain. But it seems as if she cannot make up her mind and decided on the halfway route using the approach of “caution and gradualism”
I am baffled at the Prime Minister’s approach, especially since she said that she and her government have confidence in the CCJ, but she preferred to be cautious like the People’s Republic of China and Singapore, when those two countries phased out their withdrawal from the Privy Council.
The Prime Minister made a very valid point when she said that “ties to the Privy Council developed complications in particular with respect to the issue of death penalty”. This seems to indicate that that is her main reason for routing only criminal cases to the Port of Spain-based regional court.
Persad-Bissessar is a Caribbean-trained attorney who was elevated to Queen’s Counsel last year, but she failed to take into consideration that civil appeals cost litigants a fortune and it would be unwise for the London-based Court to continue to hear them, although she agrees that there are capable judges at the CCJ. She also made the point that there has been “critical observation” from commentators, jurists and institutions concerning Trinidad and Tobago’s relationship with the Privy Council.
Moreover, on August 31 the oil rich country will celebrate its 50th anniversary of independence. It would be five decades of political independence, but they still want to hold on to the coat-tails of the British masters for civil justice.
It is ironical that Trinidad and Tobago and Jamaica were on the forefront of the regional court two decades ago and those two big countries are still tied to Britain. Moreover, Persad-Bissessar even proudly noted in her statement in Parliament last Wednesday that her mentor, Basdeo Panday, who was Prime Minister in 1999, announced that his Government would provide a site to house the CCJ.
So far only Guyana, Barbados and Belize have abolished appeals to the Privy Council and have accepted the CCJ as the final appellate court.
Dec 05, 2020ESPNcricinfo – The first ODI between South Africa and England in Cape Town has been called off, less than an hour before the toss. As reported by ESPNcricinfo, the postponement related to a...
Dec 05, 2020
Dec 05, 2020
Dec 05, 2020
Dec 05, 2020
Dec 04, 2020
Kaieteur News – Yesterday, I described the collective mind of 60 persons who signed a letter in the newspaper demanding... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – Human rights and constitutional violations in Haiti have been ignored for too... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]