Being elected to govern is a privilege, not an entitlement

Feb 18, 2012 Letters

DEAR EDITOR,
Some may see the claim made by President Ramotar that the APNU and AFC have manipulated the results of the November 2011 elections thereby denying the PPP the “minimum of 53 percent of the votes” as ludicrous or clutching at dry grass. The more important story here is that this issue shines a light on and exposes the barefacedness/sense of entitlement of the PPP.
Mr. Ramotar also accused the APNU for racial campaigning in Linden because the partnership won a traditional PNC stronghold, yet he fails to use the same argument to attack his party for winning in their strongholds. The PPP has never won Region 10 and therefore can lay no claim to it, especially after marginalising that community and the residents.
It is known by many that it was Commissioner Vincent Alexander who caught the tallying discrepancy prior to GECOM declaring the results that would have given the PPP a 33-seat parliamentary majority, and this is probably what Mr. Ramotar is alluding to. This error after declaration could have only been corrected through a court of law and until such time the PPP would have held on to a seat that they did not win. It is the view of many that in light of Alexander’s vigilance in upholding the tallying rules awarding parliamentary seats, his job as Registrar at the University of Guyana is now threatened.
In 2006, GECOM made a similar mistake in computing the parliamentary allocation of seats, robbing the AFC a Region 10 seat, which was essentially squatted on. This matter went to court, took a long time to be called, then the court could not find the document, found it after, and it was finally thrown out on technicality. In the meantime the PPP held on to the seat awaiting the Court’s ruling, using a seat it did not earn to impose their will on the people and governed against them.
The PPP has a history of accusing others of rigging elections and racism when the record shows that this party is guilty in both instances. In addition to the cases mentioned above the High Court vitiated the 1997 elections for failing to respect the constitutional right of the voters.
This attitude of the PPP clearly informs that it thinks that theirs is the right to govern this country and would call foul when they do not win or will do anything to ensure they govern. This attitude plays out at every mode or level of governance, be it at the Regional Democratic Councils, City Councils, and Neighbourhood Democratic Councils. Being elected to govern is a privilege where you serve at the behest and in the interest of others; it not an entitlement, and the PPP needs to understand the difference.
M.A.Bacchus

Latest News

Being elected to govern is a privilege, not an entitlement

Related

Similar Articles

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

The Glenn Lall Show | June 16, 2025

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Team Soesdyke prevails over Spaniards of Diamond in pulsating final

Yarrowkabra win the inaugural MCYS/NSC Janet...

Rd. of 16 starts Today; Road Warriors wallop...

LTI and UG light up the court with dominant wins...

Berbice Cricket Board awards ceremony set for...

BCB Board congratulates Kevlon Anderson on...

Features/Columnists

Time to treat our elderly with dignity

Antigua and Barbuda hosts the OAS at a crucial juncture for the Americas

A recommendation for editors: Let leaders share personal manifesto

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

Being elected to govern is a privilege, not an entitlement

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

The Glenn Lall Show | June 16, 2025

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]