Latest update March 29th, 2024 12:59 AM
Sep 04, 2011 Letters
Dear Editor,
I wish to respond to Mr. Christopher Correia’s letter on the chronology of Caribbean Aviation Maintenance Services Limited (CAMS) becoming the designated fuel handling agent at Ogle Airport.
In 2001, when the Government of Guyana leased state land to the Ogle Airport Authority (OAI) in good faith for the development of the aviation industry, and before ASL was unceremoniously ejected from the OAI board, it was decided that four sites were to be allotted for four fuel farms at the aerodrome. This was in keeping with the norm in any properly run airport where a monopoly on fuel supply is deemed inimical to the aerodrome’s efficient operation and development.
By 2008, on a map in the development plan for the airport, the caption for the area originally allocated for those fuel farms (plural) had been changed to read ‘reserved for fuel farm’ (singular). In the most recent map, in 2011, the caption has been changed yet again to now read ‘reserved for ancillary services.’
Since, as Mr. Correia pointed out, his family-owned Caribbean Aviation Maintenance Services (CAMS) has been managing the supply of all aviation products for the past 16 years at Ogle, the change in labeling to the area allotted for four fuel farms in 2001, to the present ‘ancillary services’ designation, would indicate the area is now reserved for ancillary services to the Correia-owned CAMS.
The “unusual surge in the acquisition of turbine engine aircraft particularly by Air Services Limited which brought the first of their seven Caravans in 2007”, as referred to by Mr. Correia, was simply the result of a fundamental business decision by ASL to replace our older fuel-inefficient piston-engine aircraft with the far more economical turbine-engine Cessna Caravans.
Then and now, the direct consequence of this decision is that our customers are able to charter these aircraft to transport their cargo at a fraction of the cost per pound compared to the piston-engine planes we once relied on exclusively.
Indeed if our expansion had not been strategically stymied by the OAI refusal to grant us additional land at the airport, ASL would have an even larger turbine fleet than is the case today.
ASL welcomes Mr. Correia’s assertion that CAMS has no wish to exercise a monopoly over the supply of aviation fuel at Ogle airport. A monopolistic fuel operation has the clear potential for business interruption, as was the case on 12 August 2011, when CAMS refused to sell fuel to Air Services Ltd.
It is for this reason that ASL supports the Government’s decision to import aviation fuel from Venezuela, and we would enthusiastically welcome the services of Guyoil as a fuel distributor at Ogle so that aircraft operators would have a choice and no longer be at the mercy of a single operator.
In the overall, there is a clear inequity in the composition of the six-member OAI board, now unevenly constituted with representation by three members of one family, which also decides, inter alia, on who is allowed to sell aviation fuel at Ogle. This situation constitutes an unfair business practice, which must be rectified so that Guyoil, or any other company interested in becoming a fuel handler at Ogle, is not faced with insurmountable barriers.
Annette Arjoon-Martins
Flight Operations Supt (Air Services Ltd)
THIS IDIOT TELLING GUYANA WE HAVE NO SAY IN THE 50% PROFIT SHARING AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH EXXON.
Mar 29, 2024
By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – After a series of outstanding performances in 2023, Tianna Springer, dubbed the ‘wonder girl’, is eagerly gearing up to compete in this year’s...Kaieteur News – Good Friday in Guyana is not what it used to be. The day has lost much of its solemnity. The one day... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – In the face of escalating global environmental challenges, water scarcity and... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]