I learnt to my consternation that at the Clico Head Office last Friday, the Bank of Guyana (BoG) purported to dispose of assets of the beleaguered insurance company;. cConsternation because by theat time the BoG and its attorneys should have been notified or ought to have known that it was unlawful for it to act as liquidator; and that under section 449 (b) of the Companies Act 1991, it was guilty of an offence.
Consternation, too, because among the high officials participating in the activities last Friday were Ms. Marcia Nadir-Sharma, attorney-at-law and Deputy CEO of NICIL, which should have no hand in matters relating to the liquidation of Clico assets, or any other Clico matters period.
Instead Ms. Nadir-Sharma acted as the co-ordinator of the proceedings; Commissioner of Insurance (ag.), Ms. Tracey Gibson, also an attorney-at-law; and Mr. Maurice Solomon, Chartered Accountant were there.
My understanding is that the Government might be interested in the huge building in Camp Street to house Government Mministries, and NICIL which has earned quite an unfavourable reputation over the past few years, would be in a conflict of interest.
This building has a market value of G$1.,5 billion03 M.. I understand that the highest bid was $450 M. Is mischief afoot?
Ms. Gibson has been unavailable to perform her statutory duty under section 150 of the Insurance Act to allow members of the public to inspect documents filed under that Act, but presents herself at a liquidation process in which her Office has no legal, statutory or moral role.
In fact, had her Office acted as the law required it to in relation to Clico, we would not now be in this eleven billion- dollar mess. It must be said, however, that Ms. Gibson was not Commissioner while policyholders’ money was being shipped unlawfully out of Guyana and took no active part in Friday’s proceedings.
If she was there at all, then it ought to have been to see that no hanky-panky took place. She saw a lot. Now, let us see what she is going to do about the improprieties she witnessed.
For his part, Mr. Maurice Solomon, is a long-standing director of the board of NIS which is responsible for the ill-advised and poorly supervised multi-billion dollar investment in Clico, the timing, probabilities and consequences of full recovery of which are in considerable doubt.
My information is that at the proceedings, Mr. Solomon was variously described as the “BoG representative” and as “the Liquidator”. Interestingly, Mr. Solomon’s firm is also the auditor of the New Building Society to which Clico sold its shares and which is now to be brought under the FIA!
At the apex of this all, are the Bank of Guyana and its Governor Mr. Lawrence Williams, prepared to ignore section 449, other provisions of the law and an
order of the court?.
Today, days after the issue of the amended order by the Chief Justice (ag.) revoking the appointment of the Bank of Guyana as liquidator, the Deputy Governor of the Bank is quoted as making official pronouncements regarding Clico’s liquidation, not only compounding the section 449 offence but acting in contempt of the order by the court. But this is Guyana.
Where the law is routinely, casually and flagrantly breached, where professionals abandon the rule of law in favour of silence and profits, where the press is missing at crucial times, and where all of this is sanctioned or permitted by those responsible for upholding and enforcing the law. It is time to say that Guyana “really gone”, that there is no hope for our bleeding country.
Nov 21, 2019By Zaheer Mohamed Half centuries by Veda Krishnamurty and Jemimah Rodrigues along with some steady bowling handed India Women a 61-run victory against the West Indies Women in the final T20...
One of the intriguing dimensions in the dialogue to renew the Cummingsburg Accord, is that both entities have declined to... more
Editor’s Note, If your sent letter was not published and you felt its contents were valid and devoid of libel or personal attacks, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]