Latest update April 19th, 2024 12:59 AM
Jan 12, 2010 Letters
Dear Editor,
Patrick Periera’s view of the Norway Agreement in a recent 5-page advertisement is a truly astonishing analysis…and has many of us scrambling to play catch-up.
I remember having the same sinking feeling in my stomach years ago as I came to grips with the implications of Section 5 of the Lausanne Covenant (Christian Social Responsibility).
Are we now in the realm of “eco-imperialism” in Guyana?
And is President Jagdeo still in control of the horrible mix of issues represented by rampant Brazilian mining adventurism, leftist Western politics and environmental activism, and the fact that he has been recently pushing “investment from the Arab Middle East”. Pereira’s analysis…and accusations…suggest that he is not, and go far deeper than that.
Were our planners asleep at the wheel when the Norway Agreement went down? Was there any systematic institutional planning here? Was the CRNM/CARICOM consulted?
Somehow, US$250 million doesn’t sound so rosy now.
1. But what is eco-imperialism? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-imperialism)
“…Eco-imperialism is a term coined by Paul Driessen to refer to the forceful imposition of Western environmentalist views on developing countries. The degree to which this occurs is a topic of debate, as is whether such imposition would be ethically justifiable. In his book Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death[1], Paul Driessen argues that like the European imperialists of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, today’s eco-imperialists keep developing countries destitute for the benefit of the developed world…”
“… Some commentators maintain that eco-imperialism has a racial dimension, and occurs when environmentalists place the well-being of the environment over the well-being of humans, particularly non-whites, living in developing countries. Roy Innis, chairman of the Congress of Racial Equality has argued that European Union restrictions on the use of the pesticide DDT to combat malaria are killing ‘black babies’. Environmental historian Ramachandra Guha has accused ‘authoritarian’ biologists of valuing the protection of endangered species over the well-being of local people in India and other developing countries…”
2. What are some of the anticipated consequences of eco-imperialism?
See “Eco-imperialism’s Deadly Consequences” ( http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,104889,00.html )…written 6 years ago in response to Paul Driessen’s book. The arguments are grim, and contrast drastically with the sudden and rosy promotion of an “LCDS” strategy in Guyana…while paradoxically offering one explanation of why malaria is still rampant in Guyana:
“…Driessan’s book isn’t limited to global warming and third world energy problems. The chapter “Sustainable Mosquitoes — Expendable People” describes the ongoing tragedy of the eco-activist crusade against DDT.
“Our family and community are suffering and dying from [malaria], and too many Europeans and environmentalists only talk about protecting the environment,” says 34-year old Ugandan businesswoman with malaria. “But what about the people? The mosquitoes are everywhere. You think you’re safe, and you’re not. Europeans and Americans can afford to deceive themselves about malaria and pesticides. But we can’t,” she added.
The Ugandan woman is only one of more than 300 million annual victims of malaria in the third world. Between 2-3 million die every year. “Over half the victims are children, who die at a rate of two per minute or 3,000 per day — the equivalent of 80 fully loaded school buses plunging over a cliff every day of the year,” explains Driessen.
Despite this ongoing public health horror story, the United Nations Environment Programme, World Bank, Greenpeace, Pesticide Action Network, World Wildlife Fund, Physicians for Social Responsibility and other eco-imperialist groups oppose the use of DDT — the only practical solution to the malaria crisis. The eco-imperialists’ disturbing attitude toward the third world is perhaps most frighteningly described by Robert S. Desowitz in another must-read, “The Malaria Capers,” (search) (W.W. Norton, 1991).
Desowitz reports a U.S. Agency for International Development official named Edwin Cohn as saying, “The third world didn’t require a healthy labour force because there was a surplus of workers; better some people should be sick with malaria and spread the job opportunities around.” Even more bluntly, Cohn reportedly said people in the third world were “better [off] dead than alive and riotously reproducing.”
And the final installment to this worsening debacle seems to be the following comment by Germany in a Reuters news article on July 24th 2009:
“…Germany called a French idea to slap ‘carbon tariffs’ on products from countries that are not trying to cut greenhouse gases a form of ‘eco-imperialism’ and a direct violation of WTO rules…”
Between the German comment and Patrick Pereira’s analysis, somehow US$250 million doesn’t sound so rosy now! Perhaps we all need to read more…
Roger Williams
Please share this to every Guyanese including your house cats.
Apr 19, 2024
SportsMax – West Indies Women’s captain Hayley Matthews delivered a stellar all-round performance to lead her team to a commanding 113-run victory over Pakistan Women in the first One Day...Kaieteur News – For years, the disciples of Bharrat Jagdeo have woven a narrative of economic success during his tenure... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Waterfalls Magazine – On April 10, the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]