Latest update April 19th, 2024 12:59 AM
Feb 05, 2016 Letters
Dear Editor,
Too few local observers quite appreciate that the sugar industry, reliant as it is on overseas markets for its revenue, is more an international than a local business – which is constrained by intensive union activity (more perhaps than that of the workers themselves) to an increasing extent.
The leadership not only feels they can dictate to the employers, but have in fact been propelled by non-industrial influences to do so. It is in the face of this progressive invasiveness that the management’s authority and self-confidence tended to crumble – to a point of least resistance. So that the latter at every level of the hierarchical structure acquiesced to demands which proved financially disastrous for the sustainability of the business of sugar.
The consequence was that a benign administration, mindful of its demographic support along the sugar coastland, contributed substantively to the non-viability of the business by splurging annual amounts of largesse from the public purse; while coincidentally, indeed deliberately, refusing to transmit any of the well documented EU reparations (for the loss of the guaranteed sugar market, declared well in advance) specified for the sugar industry as a whole, and of course including small cane farmers, whose counterparts in the Caribbean enjoyed proportionate benefits. In the local case, apart from vain declamations in the media, there was a deafening silence heard from routinely boisterous Unionists, much more from the concerned and vocal members of the society at large.
Curiously also, was the resigned acceptance of the continuous years of persistently poor production and productivity, admittedly occasioned by low worker attendance; but more often loudly blamed on the weather by a management cadre who dared not admit to the emasculation of their authority and control which resulted in their overall ineffectualness.
The explicit result to be observed included poor yields in estate cultivations and sub-average performance of factories.
One defence some braver managers could raise (at the risk of summary dismissals for unjustified reasons) was there was minimal funding, so that urgently required programmes of maintenance and repairs could not be effected on a timely basis. One reason being that the organisation’s creditworthiness had been so eroded that reputable (overseas) suppliers, for one, were no longer accessible for providing badly needed replacements in field and factory equipment. The situation was exacerbated by resort to a system of procurement that involved new and inexperienced local suppliers who, not surprisingly, were unacquainted with standards of quality of equipment and spares most appropriate to GuySuCo’s critical needs. The records are replete with such compromised, yet costly transactions at this level.
All the above contributed to a situation that continued to be in dire need of retrieval; but perhaps too late. One egregious example both the yea-sayers and nay-sayers agree on, has been the albatross, over the last decade, of the Chinese puzzle better known as the ‘Skeldon Factory’ – an engineering feat which never got off the ground, constructed as it was of commingled technologies sourced from varying suppliers – the totality of which never looked (and never will) add up to the vaunted processing target of 350 tonnes cane per hour.
That the Skeldon factory did better in the second crop of 2015, than in previous seasons, was essentially a measure of the very sub-standard performance of those years when, even in desperation, one Head of State publicly declared that he would apply his own considerable manipulative skills to energizing the lethargy surrounding the most ‘modern’ technological development in the sugar industry in the 21st century. Its capacity for absorbing foreign advice was insatiable, as it was for the continuous financial inputs dumped into its suspect viability – arguably depleting funding for more productive entities in Berbice and Demerara; and indeed even weaker ones, like Wales Estate, for example.
Caught in this maelstrom of crass decision-making and the consequent stream of obfuscations and misrepresentations, of the extant situation, the eyes and ears of normally alert stakeholders became befogged. So that while it might have appeared a sudden and abrupt decision, the restructuring of Wales, not its closure, was an inevitability – starved as it had been of the resources – financial and material – it so badly needed (as obtained with counterpart locations). Indeed the World Bank had indicated this a few years ago.
What is important to note is that the sugar industry has had a history of reconstruction. We are living in one of these periods – when sugar prices are not only too low, and the cost of production too high; but in the larger nutritional world, sugar is becoming an increasingly less recommended diet. Hence diversification must be!
But in all of this the role of the Unions cannot be trivialised. Rather than displaying concern about the failing health of the industry; showing leadership that would move (with their followership) towards the mitigation of falling production and productivity, they literally found that ‘obstacles’ in the field proved to be financially rewarding, and, more often than not, frightened a mis-confident management into agreeing that the latter had in fact placed so many ‘obstacles’ in the path of the workers, that they did not need to go into the field to be paid.
The records would reveal the inordinate sums paid to clear ‘obstacles’ away from strikes. Even so, such rewards were minuscule when compared to the insensitive insistence of annual wage increases, regardless of the business’ ability to pay; as well as the blatant indulgence in rewarding the non-achievement of annual targets – conditions not one of the nay-sayers would allow in their respective businesses. So should they too not be recognised as contributors – after the fact -of a truly Guyanese dilemma, one which could better be healed through the forging of genuine partnerships; rather than abstaining, and allowing the stain on our economy and society spread?
E.B. John
Where is the BETTER MANAGEMENT/RENEGOTIATION OF THE OIL CONTRACTS you promised Jagdeo?
Apr 19, 2024
SportsMax – West Indies Women’s captain Hayley Matthews delivered a stellar all-round performance to lead her team to a commanding 113-run victory over Pakistan Women in the first One Day...Kaieteur News – For years, the disciples of Bharrat Jagdeo have woven a narrative of economic success during his tenure... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Waterfalls Magazine – On April 10, the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]