Latest update March 28th, 2024 12:59 AM
Sep 01, 2015 News
Attorney- at- law, Roysdale Forde, has filed a summons in the High Court, requesting that the petition which seeks to challenge the outcome of the recently held General and Regional elections, be struck out.
The elections petition was filed on behalf of PPP/C member, Ganga Persaud, on June 23 last. According to the document, Persaud and members of the former government are questioning the validity of the May 11 polls which declared the APNU+AFC Government winners.
Persaud named the Chief Elections Officer, Keith Lowenfield, and leaders of the eight political parties, which contested in the last elections as respondents, in the matter.
In the petition, Persaud, who was appointed Election Agent of the List of Candidates for the PPP/C, claimed that the elections were “unlawfully conducted” and the result of the elections was affected or might have been affected by unlawful acts or omissions.
He underscored that the elections were not held in conformity with the Constitution of Guyana and the Representation of the People Act, Chapter 1:03.
As such, opposition essentially requested a recount of all ballot boxes for the last elections and fresh elections were also called for.
However, in a summons filed on behalf of Chief Elections Officer, last month, Attorney-at-law Roysdale Forde requested that the elections petition be struck out, on the grounds that sections of the petition failed to disclose reasonable cause of action and are frivolous and vexatious.
The summons followed a request by Attorneys representing respondents in the matter, for further and better particulars specified in paragraphs 8 subparagraphs 1- 15, of the petition.
According to the document, those paragraphs must be struck as they are in breach of sections 140 (2) of the representation of the People’s Act Cap: 1:03.
The summons also outlined that the claims in paragraphs 8 subparagraphs 1- 15, of the petition failed to provide facts to support the claims that the elections was rigged.
The PPP/C had claimed that the entire electoral process was flawed. It contained many procedural errors and instances of fraudulent and/or suspicious actions.
“Unrest, fake statements of polls (SOPs) and multiple voting were among several causes cited when the PPP/C filed its elections petition.”
The presence of “huge mobs” at several polling stations and other strategic places, particularly in Region Four, were also cited by the party as another cause for intimidation and fear which in turn “rendered it impossible for polling and counting agents, duly appointed candidates to carry out their duties and functions properly.
However, based on a request by the party for further and better particulars, Attorney -at –law, Anil Nandlall, filed an affidavit in response.
Nandlall is representing Persaud and the PPP/C in the matter. In the affidavit, the attorney asserted that the particulars provided in the election petition were sufficient for the respondents to ascertain the case against them.
“I am unable to provide any further details without an examination of the elections papers and documents which are, by law, in the possession of the Chief Elections Officer. I request this Honourable Court that it conducts a scrutiny of votes cast,”the document stated.
Nandlall in a subsequent summons requested an order directed to the Chief Election Officer.
He requested that Lowenfield produces for inspection and examination for the purpose of the Election Petition, the parcels of all election papers and documents, including those he received from the returning officer of each electoral division under section 102 of the Representation of the Peoples Act .
This, the document stated, includes all the electoral list containing the names of the persons entitled to vote , all issued a ballots , all unused ballots , all votes cast by electors , all statement of poll issued at specified polling divisions; all certificates of counting issued in respect to the votes cast at each and every polling division, and all polling books used at each and every polling station .
While there has been no mention of which Judge will preside over the hearing, all parties concerned in the matter are scheduled to convene at the Georgetown High Court, on September 24, for reports into the matter.
THIS IDIOT TELLING GUYANA WE HAVE NO SAY IN THE 50% PROFIT SHARING AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH EXXON.
Mar 28, 2024
Minister Ramson challenge athletes to better last year’s performance By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – Guyana’s 23-member contingent for the CARIFTA Games in Grenada is set to depart the...B.V. Police Station Kaieteur News – The Beterverwagting Police Station, East Coast Demerara (ECD) will be reconstructed... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – In the face of escalating global environmental challenges, water scarcity and... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]