Latest update March 29th, 2024 12:59 AM
Nov 18, 2014 Letters
Dear Editor,
From a distance, but not too distant, I have noted what purports to be a contretemps surrounding one of my areas of special interest – cane farming-amongst membership of what is styled the National Cane Farming Committee.
As the pioneer in organising the development of the ‘small’ cane farming sector in the sugar industry, beginning in the participation of the framing of the relevant Act, the Regulations; and more specifically overseeing the legal contract to be executed between Manufacturer (Estate) and Farmer. I can claim to have more institutional memory of its operations than any of the current farmers, whether or not they are members of the extant concocted Committee.
The following Table tells of those farmers, mostly Cooperative Societies which were established with my active help and direction.
The relevance of the above is to confirm whether or not cane farming activity is diminishing. So far the evidence suggests that Uitvlugt is the one estate where actual progress has been recorded.
Therefore such simple factual verifiable data need not be accompanied by the vitriol expounded by one combatant, to wit the Chairman who would appear to have lost balance in his presentation, and consequently in his status.
It is not the normal expectation in groups established to work towards consensual decision-making to publicly expose even private animosities. It not only reflects a malfunctional organisation, but often insights into the quality of management they are designed to effectuate.
At this distance one wonders too as to whether the extant rules governing membership of the NCFC are being complied with, to the extent that its membership is supposed to comprise of representatives of Cane Farmers’ District Association (if these exist). So that a query about the preponderance of officials would have been justified even in the time when once I was Vice-Chairman of the Committee, as a representative of Bookers Sugar Estates.
The debate, or rather the argumentation surrounding the efficacy of the NCFC would appear to be resolved, rather than be confounded, if there were a genuine attempt by the Guyana Sugar Corporation to have the NCFC Act and related legislation comprehensively reviewed, so that amendments can be enacted to address current issues affecting both parties, particularly those the Manufacturer hopes to engage in the future.
From this distance there appears to be a substantive organisational lacuna which critically needs to be addressed with the attributes of professionalism.
For information of all relevant stakeholders the law titled ‘Cane Farmers Contract (General Conditions) Rules’ include the Rules listed at Annexe 1 hereto.
E.B. John
THIS IDIOT TELLING GUYANA WE HAVE NO SAY IN THE 50% PROFIT SHARING AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH EXXON.
Mar 29, 2024
By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – After a series of outstanding performances in 2023, Tianna Springer, dubbed the ‘wonder girl’, is eagerly gearing up to compete in this year’s...Kaieteur News – Good Friday in Guyana is not what it used to be. The day has lost much of its solemnity. The one day... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – In the face of escalating global environmental challenges, water scarcity and... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]