Latest update March 29th, 2024 12:59 AM
Aug 03, 2009 Letters
Dear Editor,
In July 2006, at a stakeholders’ meeting at the Hotel Tower on the Hydro Power Project, President Jagdeo said he was very excited that Guyana was going to have a hydropower facility by 2010.
I was too and still am, but it appears that he has lost his enthusiasm on this issue and the new flavour of the day is the LCDS.
Well I put my views on record today; the LCDS is all about personal aggrandisement and people securing a job for themselves after 2011, since Guyana cannot benefit from the LCDS in its current form.
In our haste to position ourselves globally without a proper foundation, we have expended too much good money poorly constructing a proposal that just would not fly in its current form.
This is like socialism, it’s a great idea but if poorly implemented by people with poor ideological foundation and constantly being distracted by corruption, it is a disaster.
The President stated that in 2004, 25% of our GDP went on petroleum purchases (one of the main purchaser was GPL).
With a hydropower dam, the oil traders in the market would not have the benefit of determining the cost of our power supply.
The financial instability that is associated with the oil market is something Guyana can neither tolerate nor afford.
Thus, our failure to build a commercial hydropower station to replace the generators of GPL is most unfortunate for our people. We have had enough time to understand this dilemma and do something about it.
The President said that this investment would be a springboard for investments and developments in the value added sector. I could not have agreed with him more.
However, true to form, all that was said by the President was words, more words, and no substance behind it. This is a very dangerous precedence.
Future leaders will always refer to this current Presidency when they want to excuse poor delivery, like how we always refer to Burnham when we want to excuse abuse of democratic credentials – like not holding Local Government Elections on time.
Many dates for financial closure came and went and still we have not financially closed the deal (originally set to close in August 2007 in the boom times) and the date to turn on the turbine was suppose to have been December 15, 2010.
It is tremendously sad that Guyana would have lost another five years as we saddle ourselves with fuel power generators, which will break down again and again.
All Guyana should forever remember December 15, 2010 since this was the date when a country with so much raw potential would have been able to rid ourselves of the clear and present danger to our wellbeing called black outs.
However, this hydropower project represents more than an end to black outs, it represents a people ready to converting their potential into real development.
Want some more word with no action? I quote President Jagdeo again
“Guyana would build the hydro project no matter what.”
Those words will have dire consequences to his legacy. When that statement was made by the President in January 2008, he shifted the date of completion to December 15, 2011.
If there in any project the inheritors of power can do that will have an overwhelming positive impact on Cheddi Jagan’s people (the working class, it does matter if you are black or brown), it is to commit to and build this hydro-power project even if we have to defy the IMF and issue a country financial guarantee to the financiers.
Sasenarine Singh
THIS IDIOT TELLING GUYANA WE HAVE NO SAY IN THE 50% PROFIT SHARING AGREEMENT WE HAVE WITH EXXON.
Mar 29, 2024
By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – After a series of outstanding performances in 2023, Tianna Springer, dubbed the ‘wonder girl’, is eagerly gearing up to compete in this year’s...Kaieteur News – Good Friday in Guyana is not what it used to be. The day has lost much of its solemnity. The one day... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – In the face of escalating global environmental challenges, water scarcity and... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]